Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Benchmark Scene 2 (version 0.3.6a or higher is required)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lpotamianos
    replied
    Render version: 0.3.6a
    Config: GTX 960 4gb
    render time: 27:29

    Leave a comment:


  • Karba
    replied
    Originally posted by aleks View Post
    Karba - I have two questions about this second benchmark scene:
    1. Why did you use GI clamp value of 0,05 when exposure is 40 ( the formula 1/exposure=GI clamp) , so 1/40 = 0,025 ?
    2. Why you used standart target camera instead of Fstorm camera ?
    thanks for the benchmark scene !
    Because I wanted to.

    Leave a comment:


  • aleks
    replied
    Karba - I have two questions about this second benchmark scene:
    1. Why did you use GI clamp value of 0,05 when exposure is 40 ( the formula 1/exposure=GI clamp) , so 1/40 = 0,025 ?
    2. Why you used standart target camera instead of Fstorm camera ?
    thanks for the benchmark scene !

    Leave a comment:


  • aleks
    replied
    Render version: 0.3.6a
    Config: GTX 1080
    rendertime : 10:36

    Leave a comment:


  • erkut
    replied
    Render version: 0.3.6a
    Config: GTX 960
    render time: 25:01

    Leave a comment:


  • Zeus
    replied
    Render version: 0.3.6a
    Config: 1 x GTX 970
    render time: 17.14

    Leave a comment:


  • damião
    replied
    Render version: 0.3.6a
    Config: 2 x GTX 970
    render time: 9.53

    Leave a comment:


  • oguzbir
    replied
    Render version: 0.3.6a
    Config: 2 x GTX 1070 FE
    Render time: 5:59 (OC# 1) OC clock 2126MHz MemClock 4354MHz
    Render time: 5:58 (OC# 1) same same

    (overclock #1) Core Voltage %0 Power %112 Temp 90c Coreclock +225MHz Memclock + 550MHz
    (overclock #2) Core Voltage %+90 Power %112 Temp 90c Coreclock +225MHz Memclock + 550MHz

    Leave a comment:


  • snakeboxmedia
    replied
    Originally posted by vladleleiva View Post
    snakeboxmedia , yes just wait, estimation is wrong. I've panicked myself when first saw 30 min estimated time :-).
    Okay cool, thank you I will let it run later! Love how Fstorm is really coming around.

    Leave a comment:


  • vladleleiva
    replied
    snakeboxmedia , yes just wait, estimation is wrong. I've panicked myself when first saw 30 min estimated time :-).

    Leave a comment:


  • Korsa
    replied
    Originally posted by snakeboxmedia View Post
    So I only had a quick run at this but... something seems off. I got similar scores to everyone else in the first benchmark, but so far using a 1080 + 770 and the latest nvidia drivers, after 3mins max is estimating a total of 28mins ??? Does some crazy magic happen after 10mins or? Sorry I haven't had 30 mins to try and let it run through yet but that feels very fishy.
    Just let it render. You will see the final time. Adaptive sampling will reduce the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • snakeboxmedia
    replied
    So I only had a quick run at this but... something seems off. I got similar scores to everyone else in the first benchmark, but so far using a 1080 + 770 and the latest nvidia drivers, after 3mins max is estimating a total of 28mins ??? Does some crazy magic happen after 10mins or? Sorry I haven't had 30 mins to try and let it run through yet but that feels very fishy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Albert3D
    replied
    Render version: 0.3.6a
    Config: 2x MSI GTX 1080 8GB AERO OC Edition
    Render time: 5:29

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_1019.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	951.8 KB
ID:	5762

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex Dorokhin
    replied
    Render version: 0.3.6a
    Config: GTX 780 Ti + GTX 980 Ti
    Render time: 9:07

    Leave a comment:


  • vladleleiva
    replied
    Render version: 0.3.6a
    Config: ASUS GTX 1070
    Render time: 12:49

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X